"Pardeep Kumar Rapria, Advocate, the petitioner who appears in person submits that although he has prayed for quashing of certain State Government Orders marked at Annexure P-6, P-9 and P-12 to Writ Petition No.247 of 2015 filed by him in which names of those who were appointed as law officers in the State of Haryana have been enumerated but he does not press the said prayer. Therefore, we direct transfer of Writ Petition No.247 of 2015 from the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, Chandigarh to this Court for hearing and disposal." - S.C. 10.09.2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORDINARY ORIGINAL
JURISDICTION
TRANSFER PETITION (Civil) No. 1073 of 2015
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.2 SECTION IV
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C).....CC No(s). 5470/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/09/2013 in LPA No. 1458/2013,25/09/2013
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C).....CC No(s). 5470/2014(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25/09/2013 in LPA No. 1458/2013,25/09/2013
in CWP No.20000/2011 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)
IN THE MATTER OF:
PARDEEP KUMAR RAPRIA ...PETITIONER
//VERSUS//
STATE OF
HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
In Supreme Court, on my decision of not pressing my prayer for removal of Advocates already appointed in the AG Office, Har., some friends suggested that I should have pursued my prayer. But, in fact, I have had no malice or personal grudge towards anyone. Only because of legal requirement of filing a petition; I had to array them as private Respondents. Otherwise, I have nothing against any individual but against the spoilt system which is put into action by extraneous considerations.
ReplyDelete