Do residents have right to demand information
from their ‘Residents Welfare Society’, under the Right to Information Act?
This is the very crucial and important question from the point of view of all
residents, because residents often
feel victimised by the maladministration and financial irregularities in the
functioning of their ‘Residents Welfare Societies’. In the absence of the
‘Right to Demand Information’; the residents feel very helpless while facing day
to day problems relating to the electricity, security, maintenance, housekeeping,
parking etc. Such right to demand information becomes more important when the
residents can’t approach the Governmental Authorities for redressal of their
grievances, because in private residential societies all amenities are provided
by the ‘Residents Welfare Societies’ after charging heavy maintenance charges
from residents and the Govt. Authorities have minimum interference in such
matters.
The
above important question will be dealt by the State Information Commission
Haryana, (hereinafter read as SIC); on Tuesday (on 22-01-2019) in a the
case titled: ‘Pardeep Kumar Rapria, Advocate Vs. DLF Valley Residents Welfare
Society, Panchkula’ The Petitioner has
filed a complaint before the SIC; while submitting that being the resident of a
residential colony DLF Valley Panchkula, he is the member of housing society
namely Valley Residents Welfare Society (hereinafter read as DLF
VRWS);, which has been
registered under the ‘Societies Act, 2012’. And, being a
members/resident of the DLF VRWS, has right to demand information under
the RTI Act, because in terms of the ‘Societies Act, 2012’ the residential
society is duty bound to share information with residents; as per the procedure
prescribed under the RTI Act. However, residents are unable to submit a request
for information to the ‘Public Information Officer’ as no such officer has been
appointed by the DLF VRWS under the RTI Act. Therefore, Mr.
Rapria has requested the SIC to give direction to
the DLF VRWS to implement the provisions of the RTI
Act; by appointing the Public Information Officer, so that all residents, can aks
information relating to their day to day problems. Earlier, Mr. Pardeep Rapria
had raised the same question of law before the High Court in case titled: ‘Pardeep
Kumar Rapria Vs. State Information Commission and others’, but in view of
the fact that DLF VRWS had provided
complete information to the Petitioner before the High Court, the question of law involved in the matter was
left open by the Court. Now, the question of law is again being raised, so that
all residents can get the right to ask information from the DLF VRWS,
because every resident is not expected and can not afford to approach High Court; asking for the
very basic information relating to his day to day problems.
The decision of the SIC will
have far reaching impact not only on the rights of the residents of DLF VRWS, but also on the rights of the countless
residents of numerous ‘Residents Welfare Societies’ throughout the
States of Haryana and Punjab. After all, ‘RIGHT TO INFORMATION’ is the
Fundamental Human Right of every human being.
No comments:
Post a Comment