Advocate General Letter in reference to the disclosure of details of corrupt IAS, IPS, HPS, HCS Officers.

In reference to the adjourned case relating to the disclosure of the details of corrupt IAS, IPS, HCS and HPS Officers, Pardeep Kumar Rapria, Advocate for the Petitioner have received an E-mail and also a letter from the Advocate General, Haryana. I am baffled on receipt of the such communication. See the letter received from AG, Haryana and reply of the same.

 

REPLY: 

                                                                                                                                             By Hand & Through E-mail

Dated: 23.05.2016

To,

                        The Advocate General, Haryana

                        Punjab & Haryana High Court,

                        Chandigarh

Subject: Memo No. 25270, Dated: 18.05.2016 of the AG, Haryana, in reference to CWP No. 17718 of 2014 (Subhash Vs. State Information Commission, Haryana and ors.)

Respected Sir,

In reference to the captioned matter; this is to inform you that after the hearing of the matter, on 13.05.2016 itself, I had handed over the relevant‘The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha’ and ‘United Nations Convention against Corruption 2003’ to Ms. Gaganpreet Kaur, AAG, Haryana.

Moreover, I had also filed the requisite compilation in the HC Registry; as the registry does not accept the documents without getting served the advance on the Respondents

Be that as it may, third time I am submitting  Annexure‘The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha’ and ‘United Nations Convention against Corruption 2003’ and the judgement relied upon by the Counsel for Petitioner. I am submitting the complete soft copy of the requisite compilation, i.e., The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha’ and ‘United Nations Convention against Corruption 2003’ etc. through E-mail, as due to financial constraints the Petitioner may not be able to supply the print-out of the voluminous documents. Therefore, kindly see the below mentioned documents/law:

(i)                The Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha.

(ii)             ‘United Nations Convention against Corruption 2003’

(iii)           S.P. Gupta v. President of India and Ors, AIR 1982 SC 149

(iv)           ‘Ram Jethmalani & ors Versus Union of India & ors. (Writ Petition (Civil) 176 of 2009)

(v)              The State of UP v. Raj Narain, AIR 1975 SC 865

(vi)           R.R. Gopal & another Vs. State of Tamil  Nadu- W.P.(C) No. 422 of 1994

(vii)         Arun Aggarwal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh- SLP (Crl.) No. 364-366 of 2010

(viii)      Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms, AIR 2002 SC 2112

(ix)           Secretary General, Supreme Court of India Versus Subhash Chandra Agarwal (Delhi HC) LPA No. 501/2009

(x)              UPSC versus R.K. Jain [W.P(C) No.1243/2011 (Delhi HC)

(xi)           The CPIO, Supreme Court of India, versus Subhash Chandra Agarwal & another (Writ Petition No. 288/2009)

(xii)         Rajinder Jaina Vs. Central Information Commission, WP (C) No. 8524/2009

(PARDEEP KUMAR RAPRIA)

ADVOCATE

COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER